Tag: MCAS results for Newton Public Schools

  • MCAS Results for Newton Public Schools

    MCAS Results for Newton Public Schools

    MCAS test scores Newton, Newton MCAS tells story of diversity and successMCAS Scores Tell a Story of Diversity and Success in Newton

    What do the MCAS scores reveal about Newton? One of the big draws for us to move to Newton is the ethnic and socio-economic diversity which is rare in metro west suburbs of Boston.

    While the numbers don’t lie, there is back story. Given that Newton has a large degree of kids who speak English as a second language, it’s understandable that their scores would be lower in elementary school as they master two languages. Newton public schools scores handily outperform Massachusetts by 20 percentage points (give or take a few) across all grades and subjects.

    What is really interesting (and great!) is that by 10th grade, 96% of students are proficient or higher in English, 94% in Math, and 87% in Science/Engineering. My daughter’s English/Social Studies teacher at Day Middle School raised her three kids in Newton, and, due to redistricting, had two kids in Newton South High School and one graduating from Newton North. She said, “Kids get a great education in Newton no matter where they go.” The numbers concur!

    Data is from Department of Education.

    Grade and Subject Proficient or Higher Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/ Failing Students Included CPI SGP Included in SGP
    DISTRICT STATE DISTRICT STATE DISTRICT STATE DISTRICT STATE DISTRICT STATE
    GRADE 03 – READING 80 61 29 15 51 46 17 30 3 9 921 93.0 N/A N/A
    GRADE 03 – MATHEMATICS 78 61 47 27 31 34 17 25 6 14 921 90.5 N/A N/A
    GRADE 04 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 75 57 28 13 47 44 19 30 6 14 1,029 90.3 63.0 934
    GRADE 04 – MATHEMATICS 74 51 35 16 39 35 20 36 6 12 1,031 90.2 61.0 940
    GRADE 05 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 84 61 39 17 45 44 13 28 4 11 928 93.8 65.0 866
    GRADE 05 – MATHEMATICS 82 57 55 25 27 32 11 26 7 17 934 91.9 64.0 875
    GRADE 05 – SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG 71 52 37 22 34 30 23 34 6 14 933 88.5 N/A N/A
    GRADE 06 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 86 66 42 18 44 48 9 22 4 11 929 94.3 58.0 867
    GRADE 06 – MATHEMATICS 83 60 54 27 29 33 11 24 6 16 933 92.6 52.0 874
    GRADE 07 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 89 71 32 15 57 56 9 21 2 7 877 95.5 57.0 813
    GRADE 07 – MATHEMATICS 79 51 48 20 31 31 14 30 7 18 877 90.2 62.0 815
    GRADE 08 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 93 81 36 18 57 63 5 14 2 6 870 97.3 60.0 823
    GRADE 08 – MATHEMATICS 80 52 52 22 28 30 13 28 7 19 875 90.3 64.0 831
    GRADE 08 – SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG 63 43 11 5 52 38 28 38 9 20 869 83.6 N/A N/A
    GRADE 10 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 96 88 61 37 35 51 3 9 1 3 908 98.9 59.0 791
    GRADE 10 – MATHEMATICS 94 78 77 50 17 28 4 15 2 7 904 97.3 61.0 788
    GRADE 10 – SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG 87 69 54 24 33 45 10 25 3 6 861 94.5 N/A N/A
    ALL GRADES – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 86 69 38 19 48 50 11 22 3 9 6,462 94.6 60.0 5,094
    ALL GRADES – MATHEMATICS 81 59 52 27 29 32 13 26 6 15 6,475 91.8 61.0 5,123
    ALL GRADES – SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG 74 54 34 17 40 37 20 32 6 13 2,663 88.8 N/A N/A

    Compared to most of Boston’s Metro West suburbs, Newton has a diverse population with significant Asian, African American and Hispanic populations. The elementary schools with Level 2 Assistance and Accountability is due to a  large proportion of English as a second language students. Newton provides the support they need as evidenced by high overall scores in 10th grade.

    Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity (2011-12)
    Race % of District % of State
    African American 5.4 8.3
    Asian 15.6 5.7
    Hispanic 7.0 16.1
    Native American 0.1 0.2
    White 66.6 67.0
    Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander 0.0 0.1
    Multi-Race, Non-Hispanic 5.3 2.5
    School Accountability Information

    School School Type Title I Status Accountability and Assistance Level
    A E Angier Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    Bowen Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    C C Burr Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Cabot Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Countryside Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Franklin Elementary School Title I School (TA) Level 2
    Lincoln-Eliot Elementary School Title I School (TA) Level 2
    Horace Mann Elementary School Title I School (TA) Level 1
    Mason-Rice Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Peirce Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Memorial Spaulding Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    Underwood Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    John Ward Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Williams Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    Zervas Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    Bigelow Middle Middle School Title I School (TA) Level 1
    Charles E Brown Middle Middle School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    F A Day Middle Middle School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    Oak Hill Middle Middle School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 2
    Newton North High High School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Newton South High High School Non-Title I School (NT) Level 1
    Newton Early Childhood Center Early Elementary School Non-Title I School (NT) Insufficient data
  • MCAS Results for Newton Public Schools

    MCAS Results for Newton Public Schools

    MCAS Test Results Newton Massachusetts Newton Public School I Love Newton MA

    The MCAS results are in and the results are impressive as usual. Here’s an assortment of information. The big story about the MCAS is the Newton North Junior who caught the MCAS error.

    “Michael Safran, 16, a Newton North junior contacted the department to contest the results. Safran, who only missed one question on the math portion, told the paper he checked a pamphlet to see what questions he got wrong and noticed he lost more credit than he should have. Safran then examined how the raw scores were converted to the scaled scores on the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s website.

    Mitchell Chester, the state’s commissioner of elementary and secondary education, told the Boston Globe that the testing contractor, Measured Progress, calculated the raw scores of the math portion of the MCAS accurately, but scaled them incorrectly. As a result, the scores of 3,521 students statewide were misclassified with a performance level that was too low.

    While education officials said they are working with Measured Progress to address the reporting error, the performance levels for 1,364 students will increase from “needs improvement” to “proficient.” The performance levels of 1,887 students will increase from “proficient” to “advanced.”

    Here are the links including a letter from Day Middle School’s principal Brian Turner as an example of how Newton Public Schools handles the test results.

    ——————————-

    MCAS results for Newton Public Schools

    Newton North Junior Catches MCAS Error, from WickedLocal Newton.com

    District as a Whole Outperforms the State , from WickedLocal Newton.com

    “According to results, 86 percent of all Newton students performed proficient or higher in English Language Arts – up 1 percent from 2010. Thirty-six percent performed at an advanced level, 50 percent were marked as proficient, 11 percent needs improvement and 3 percent are in danger of failing.

    In math, 81 percent performed proficient or higher – up 2 percent from 2010. Forty-eight percent landed in the advanced category, 33 percent performed proficiently, 13 percent need improvement and 5 percent are in danger of failing.”

    Brian Turner Principal Day Middle School Newton Massachusetts I Love Newton MA

    From Brian Turner, Principal at Day Middle School:

    Spring 2011 MCAS Results

    You may have already read a letter from Superintendent David Fleishman (found online at http://www3.newton.k12.ma.us/sites/default/files/AYP%20District%20letter0001.pdf), which explain the district-wide 2011 MCAS results. While Superintendent Fleishman’s letter addresses information about the district, I will write specifically here about Day’s students’ results.

    Day has now received official scores from the 2011 MCAS assessments, and you may have also received your child’s scores. Day’s results indicate a continuation of high progress for Day overall. The overwhelming majority of our students scored at the proficient or advanced performance levels on both the English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics assessments. In ELA, 97% of Day’s students either 1) scored proficient or advanced or 2) met their annual improvement targets. In mathematics, 91.1% of the students either 1) scored proficient or advanced or 2) met their annual improvement targets. As has been historically the case, our aggregate scores for the entire school for both subject areas continue to meet improvement targets. In addition to aggregate scores, all subgroups in ELA and mathematics met their improvement targets in 2011, save the Hispanic subgroup whose 2011 aggregate ELA and mathematics scores were slightly lower than the 2010 Hispanic cohort’s aggregate scores.

    Therefore, our NCLB accountability status in ELA is currently “Corrective Action – Subgroups” and in mathematics is “Restructuring Year 2 – Subgroups,” which means we have two consecutive years to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for all subgroups in order to have no accountability status in ELA and mathematics. While we are happy with the results in the aggregate in ELA and mathematics, we are committed to helping all of our students reach their improvement targets and are committed to closing achievement gaps.

    Improvement Plans

    Day faculty and staff have worked hard to raise the achievement of all students, and we will continue our efforts to implement effective and supportive interventions for students and provide professional development opportunities for teachers. Listed below are some of the improvement steps we have taken in previous years and will continue for the coming year:

    1. A Mathematics Instructional Coach will work closely throughout this upcoming academic year with Day’s mathematics teachers to improve our students’ performance outcomes.

    2. A Literacy Instructional Coach will work closely throughout this upcoming academic year with all of Day’s teachers to improve our students’ literacy levels.

    3. We will once again provide students with a license to use “Study Island,” an on-line math and English Language Arts skill practice website. The site is web-based, and is available for student use both in school and at home.

    4. We will enhance small group mathematics classes for students who need additional supports in the 7th and 8th grades.

    5. We will maximize team extension time, identifying students who need extra help during the school day with their regular math or English teachers.

    6. We will continue offering homework club and a variety of study groups for struggling students.

    7. The teachers’ professional development will focus on collaboratively analyzing student academic data to make informed decisions about curricula, instruction and student support services.

    As we analyze our most recent results in more detail, additional action steps will be taken to address the students’ targeted areas of need. As was mentioned in Superintendent Fleishman’s letter, involving parents as partners in the education of their children is an important part of NCLB. We encourage you to become involved in helping us raise the achievement of all Day students by attending parent-teacher conferences, volunteering with the PTO, attending parent meetings and coffees, providing a study area at home and encouraging your child to keep up with his or her homework. These are just some of the many steps you can take to enhance your own child’s achievement.